Ex: In
the circuit below, label currents in each element and then label potential
differences according to the passive sign convention.
Ans:
(Any
labeling with current measurement arrows pointing from + signs to - signs of
voltage measurements is valid.)
Sol'n: The
answer is not unique. We may choose either direction for the + and - of the
voltage measurement for each resistor and then label the current measurement
with an arrow pointing from the + sign to the - sign. Or we may choose either
direction for the current measurement arrow for each resistor and then label
the voltage measurement with the + and - sign such that the current measurement
arrow points toward the - sign. What matters is the consistency of voltage and
current measurements with each other, not the actual direction of current flow
or the sign of actual voltage.
When
we deal with a source, we normally leave it as is and avoid adding labels to
it. Sometimes, however, we may wish to calculate the power dissipation for a
source. In that case, we take the + and - sign or the arrow as the direction
of one measurement, and we make the other measurement consistent with it.
Thus,
if we were to measure current in the voltage sources for the above circuit, the
arrows would all point down. If we were to measure voltage in the current
source for the above circuit, the + sign would be on top and the - sign would
be on the bottom.
It
often turns out to be convenient to label resistors with the current
measurement arrow pointing to the right or pointing down. This often matches
the direction of the physical current flow and is often the direction we would
measure the output voltage for a circuit. Later on, we will usually designate
the bottom wire on a circuit diagram as the "reference" which is
where the minus sign of every voltage measurement will be located.
Note:
we normally add voltage and current measurement labels for only the resistors
in a circuit.